| The Attributes of the Believers as Defined in Surah Al-Mu'minun (Part 2/2) |
|
|
|
| Tafsir (Exegesis) | |
| Khalid El-Gharib 06 December 2003 | |
|
This article was published in the 19th issue of "Nida'ul Islam magazine, July - August 1997
(5) And those who guard their chastity (6) Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that the right hand possess, for then, they are free from blame; (7) But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors; (8) And those who are faithfully true to their Amanat and to their covenants; (9) And those who strictly guard their (five compulsory congregational) Salawat (prayers) (at their fixed stated hours). (10) These are indeed the inheritors. (11) Who shall inherit the Firdaus (Paradise). They shall dwell therein forever. In part 1 of this article , a careful contemplation of the opening exalted verses of Surah Al-Mu'minun was introduced. This article will complete the insight on the signs of Iman in the oneself. The believer who attains noble attributes and upright conduct has truely found the road to Paradise. The guide to these noble attributes can only come from the last revelation, the Holy Qur'an. When the opening verses of Surah Al-Mu'minun were revealed, the Prophet (s.a.w.) remarked: ".. the one who measures up to them, will most surely go to paradise" [Ahmad Tirmithy, Nasa'i, Hakem]. And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts from illegal sexual acts) They are modest in every sense of the word. They are free from sex abuse and sex perversion. They are so modest that they even conceal those parts of their bodies which the Law forbids to expose before others. This is the true purification of the household and the society and the true prevention from corruption of lineage and genealogy. Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that the right hand possess, for then, they are free from blame;
But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors;
(1) Two categories of women have been excluded from the general command of guarding the private parts: wives and women who are legally in one's possession, i.e. slave girls. Thus, the verse clearly lays down the law that one is allowed to have sexual relations with one's slave-girl as with one's wife, the basis being possession and not marriage. It should be noted that Islam came at a time where slavery was an international system and when the prisoners of war were taken as bondsmen according to the national law. It is clear that Islam during the battles with his enemy, could not have forbidden this system from his side, so that Muslim captives could be taken as slaves while Islam frees the captives of his enemy. So, Islam prevented all the sources of slavery, except the source of the prisoners of war. Hence, when captives in war fall as bondswomen, it was permissible for Muslims to have sexual relations with those who they possessed. This sexual relation is to satisfy the natural need of the captured women, so that they do not involve in filthy sexual relations like what is happening today with the prisoners of war all over the world under the New World Order, even though policies have forbidden them. This anarchy is discouraged by Islam and so Islam encourages the freedom of such slaves by many methods, for example, when the bondswoman begets, then her son is a free man; if her master freed her voluntarily or as an atonement to hitting her on the face; by an agreement which the bondswoman can pay a sum of money as her ransom, etc. In any case, slavery was a necessity of war at that time, and it was the system of dealing in reply. However, it was not a result of the Islamic social system.1 (2) The law prescribed in the parenthesis is only applicable to men as is clear from the Text and the bondsman is unlawful for the woman possessing him. The wisdom why the slave has been forbidden for the woman is that he can only satisfy her sexual desire but cannot become guardian and governor of herself and her household, which leaves a serious flaw in the family life. (3) The sentence "But whoever seeks beyond that (in lust for sexual desire) , then those are the transgressors" has made satisfaction in other ways unlawful, whether it be through fornication, homosexuality, sex gratification with animals, or some other means. The jurists only differ slightly with regard to masturbation. Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal regards it as lawful if it aids in the absteinance from adultery, but Imams Malik and Shafi'i regard it as absolutely unlawful; and though the Hanafies also regard it as unlawful, they give the opinion that if a person indulges sometimes in masturbation under the fit of passion, it is expected that he will be forgiven the error. Masturbation is unhealthy and can lead to medical and psychological problems. The jurists agree that anything that brings harm is unlawful especially if it becomes a common habit. (4) Although the absolute prohibition of Mut'ah (temporary marriage) was not until the year of the conquest of Makkah, some commentators argue the prohibition of Mut'ah from this verse. The correct position however, is that the prohibition of Mut'ah is based on the authentic Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.) and the consensus opinion of the jurists. Therefore it is wrong to say that it was prohibited by Umar (r.a.a.). Umar (r.a.a.) only enforced it as a law of Islam and publicised it among the people. This had not been done earlier because the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.) had forbidden Mut'ah only during the latter part of his worldly life. The deviant Shi'ite view that Mut'ah is absolutely lawful and permissible has no sanction and support in the Qur'an, Sunnah or sound mind. The fact is that a few of the companions, their followers and jurists who regarded it permissible in the early days of Islam, did so only in cases of extreme necessity and need. None of them held the view that it was absolutely lawful like marriage and could be practised in normal circumstances. 'Abdullah bin 'Abbas (r.a.a.) who is generally cited as a prominent supporter of the view of permissibility has himself explained his position, thus: "It is just like carrion which is lawful for a person only in extreme necessity". Even Ibn 'Abbas had to revise his opinion when he saw that people were abusing permissibility and started practising Mut'ah freely regardless of genuine need and necessity. Holding Mut'ah as absolutely permissible, practising it without any real necessity or restoring to it even when one has a legally wedded wife or wives is a kind of license which is abhorred by good taste, much less it be attributed to the Shari'ah of Muhammad (s.a.w.) and imputed to the learned jurists of his family. For if Mut'ah it would imply that there should exist in society a low class of women, like the prostiwho shobe available for the purpose as and when required, or if not that, Mut'ah be restricted to the daughters and sisters to the poor stratum of society and the well to do be given the freedom to exploit them as and when they like. Can such an injustice and discrimination be expected of the Divine Law? And those who are faithfully true to their Amanat (all the duties which Allah has ordained, honesty, moral responsibility, and trust, etc.) and to their covenants;
And those who strictly guard their (five compulsory congregational) Salawat (prayers) (at their fixed stated hours).
These are indeed the inheritors.
Firdaus or paradise is a vast garden adjoining the dwelling of a person and enclosed by defence walls and containing all kinds of fruit trees, especially vines. The inheritance of paradise by believers should be their dwelling forever n
Footnotes:
1. A sincere person who wants to understand the Qur'anic Law in this regard should study An-Nisa (4:3, 5), Al-Ahzab (33:50, 52) and Al-Ma'arij (70:30) together with this verse in Al-Mu'minun. For further explanation see
References:
|
|


